Correction is not corrective action
Repairing the 12 drawers that stick is a correction: it fixes these units. Finding out why they stick and changing that is corrective action: it stops the next order from having the same fault. Under time pressure, the first is easily presented as the second. Ask "why" until the answer is something the factory can change, such as a worn jig, a missing check or an unclear specification.
Example of a CAP
| Finding | Root cause | Action | Owner and date | Verified by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drawer runners fitted out of square on chests of drawers | Worn drilling jig | New jig; first 10 units checked each shift | Production head, before assembly resumes | Next inspection, runners checked on every sampled unit |
| Barcode labels missing on some cartons | Label printer failed; no check at the packing station | All cartons relabelled; barcode scan added at packing | Packing supervisor, before reinspection | Random cartons scanned at reinspection |
| No record of incoming fabric checks (audit) | No written procedure | Roll log for GSM and shade on receipt | QC manager, before the next order is cut | Log reviewed at the next DUPRO |
Each row ends in a check by someone other than the person who made the fix. Without that column, a CAP is a promise.
How Clear To Load works with CAPs
The plan belongs to the factory, because only the factory can change its process. In a during-production inspection, our inspector records each systematic defect with the action and date agreed with the factory. After a factory audit, the scored gaps give the factory a ready list to answer. After a Hold or Not cleared verdict we can explain each finding and help you agree actions with the supplier. The follow-up visit or pre-shipment inspection then checks that the actions were made.